Here we go...
A total of 32 clues this week; there was a flood of anagrams (the word didn’t offer much else

), with a smattering of weird and wonderful takes on the definition. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed going through them all, though that was partly because there was half the usual number of clues!
It seems perverse to me that a complete novice should be judging between these fine entries; feel free to challenge any judgment I make that is incorrect, unfair or simply unaware. Please also excuse wherever I have made suggestions or changes. I like the idea that the forum be used partly didactically, and so I’ve tried to be constructive with criticism.
And so, we start with the band of clues, where definition, wordplay or surface was decidedly suspect:
TRAGICS T SahasrabudheA doom come true!CD
So, here's my understanding of this one, and correct me if I'm wrong: CATACLYSM is the only word with 9 letters that is synonomous with 'doom'? Hmm. What about 'Judgement' or 'Ruination'? I'm not even sure if CATACLYSM can be a synonym of 'doom'! And I don't understand how 'come true' indicates that intention. The phrase, with the allusion to 'dream' seems tantalising but it’s a step too far.
S T SahasrabudheMad with fury this can make my cur flay catsComp anag MYCURFLAYCATS*-FURY
Can a cataclysm be mad with fury? And would it make your dog want to flay cats when it was? And where’s the def.?
S T SahasrabudheRocked with violence this can make camel sit concavelyComp anag – CAMELSITCONCAVELY*-VIOLENCE
Similar complaint to previous clue: no def. (unless it’s supposed to be ‘rocked with violence’, which doesn’t work, or an &lit, which is unthinkable). A bizarre and humorous image nonetheless.
S T SahasrabudheViolent break must take years after kicking off a great changeCATACLASM –A + Y
Sorry S T, it’s not all bad news from me this week – you do have a couple in the higher ranks! Personally, I would never have reached CATACLASM for 'Violent break'. It's in OED so I should bow, but it feels like it would more at home in an advanced. I'm not sure about Y for years either. Finally, wouldn’t 'off' indicate an extremity rather than a contained letter? I'm intrigued by the surface - a Big Bang ref?
ProlixicDisaster of tiger's cytoplasm being mixed without lidCAT+CY[-top]LASM*
A common domestic situation – I’m forever wiping tiger cytoplasm off the kitchen walls! The apostrophe ‘s’ is not needed, particularly as it messes up the anagram fodder (as it stands – CATSCYLASM). ‘Without lid’ is nicely misleading but it was the bizarre surface which tipped this one for me.
SWKWreaks havoc, but in my place acts strangely? Nope!MYPLACEACTS* -PE
Too much I’m not sure of here. 1) ‘but in’ doesn’t really make sense, surface or wordplay, 2) Nope = ‘-PE’ – would be interested to hear comments on this device – not sure myself! I like ‘wreaks havoc’ though, though perhaps it needs a little extra like ‘one’. How about: ‘One wreaks havoc in my place, acts wildly, wanting training’
PhisheepCats lay writhing around in extremes of cream orgasm?CATSLAY* in C(rea)M
Don’t want to linger on this image for too long! Wordplay is fine here (though cream should probably be creamy in the surface), it’s the definition that is one step too far removed for me. Though Chambers has orgasm as ‘violent excitement’ I’m not sure it carries the same sense of ‘catastrophe’ as the clue word. That said, I’m not intimately familiar with phisheep’s feline’s habits...
BoxwoodWearing coat back to front, Patrick, perhaps, returns holding clay, to create havocCA{T{ACLY*}S<}M – double container
I like the picture, though 'perhaps' is awkward in the surface. Also there's no indication that CLAY should be mixed, unless that's what 'to create' is intended to be. I’m not sure ‘havoc’ can be used as a definition – ‘causes havoc’ would be more accurate.
GymBunniesKey calamity no-one wrought about the end of days!&lit C+CALAM(-I)TY* about (day)S
Nice idea with the &lit though the overall definition is too over-wrought (ahem). I'm still not sure what I think about 'no-one' as an indicator of ’- i’. I think it’s slightly fairer than ‘nope’ for ‘-pe’ because of the hyphen.
LoonapickClay cats smashed on the first of May –disaster!CLAYCATS*+M
Wordplay is faultless, but the surface is benign - unless there is an obscure May Day tradition that I don't know about!
QixDisciple divides dogma discussion debacleHomophone CATAC(L)YSM
Yikes! A heroic effort. Not sure 'dogma discussion' adequately indicates the homophone - wouldn't you need something like 'dogma during discussion'? Keeps the alliteration going but ruins the surface somewhat! Further query - doesn't a homphone have to indicate another actual word that sounds similar rather than a collection of letters?
RavenActs calmly but carelessly, having lost a pound. Disaster!ACTSCALMLY* - L
Yes, perhaps these days, even the loss of a single pound is a disaster! Not sure about the 'but', I think a rejiggle would help: 'Acts calmly, having lost a pound carelessly. Disaster!' Or maybe a different anagrind would lend a slightly different slant on the surface and help justify the 'Disaster!': 'in a flap', 'worried', 'troubled', etc.
GazzaFoolishly cast clout with May not out. Calamity!CASTCL(-out)MAY*
Wordplay is fine, but the surface is confusing. It may make more sense to cricket fans, but if you’re clouting (batting?) then you should be worried if May’s fielding, not still in bat?
S T SahasrabudheProduce a chemical reaction getting carbon core mass to replace energy for a violent changeCATA(C)LYS(-E)+M
I'm not sure about 'produce a chemical reaction' for CATALYSE. A catalyst speeds up a reaction, it doesn't produce one. And I'm not sure 'core' is necessary, though a nice touch. How about: 'Speed up chemical reaction, inserting carbon mass instead of energy for violent change'